Skip to main content
Download PDF

Characteristics of soil organic carbon fractions in four vegetation communities of an inland salt marsh

Carbon Balance and Management volume 19, Article number: 3 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The study of soil organic carbon characteristics and its relationship with soil environment and vegetation types is of great significance to the evaluation of soil carbon sink provided by inland salt marshes. This paper reports the characteristics of soil organic carbon fractions in 0–50 cm soil layers at four vegetation communities of the Qinwangchuan salt marsh.

Results

(1) The soil organic carbon content of Phragmites australis community (9.60 ± 0.32 g/kg) was found to be higher than that of Salicornia europae (7.75 ± 0.18 g/kg) and Tamarix ramosissima (4.96 ± 0.18 g/kg) and Suaeda corniculata community (4.55 ± 0.11 g/kg). (2) The soil dissolved organic carbon, particulate organic carbon and soil microbial biomass carbon in 0–50 cm soil layer of Phragmites australis community were higher, which were 0.46 ± 0.01 g/kg, 2.81 ± 0.06 g/kg and 0.31 ± 0.01 g/kg, respectively. (3) Soil organic carbon was positively correlated with dissolved organic carbon, particulate organic carbon, and microbial biomass carbon, and negatively correlated with easily oxidized organic carbon. (4) Above-ground biomass has a strong direct positive effect on soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and pH have a strong direct positive effect on microbial biomass carbon content, pH and average density have a strong direct negative effect on easily oxidized organic carbon, and particulate organic carbon.

Conclusions

The interaction between plant community characteristics and soil factors is an important driving factor for soil organic carbon accumulation in inland salt marshes.

Background

Wetland is an important part of the terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycle, with high carbon storage capacity. Comprising one-third of the global organic soil carbon pool, wetlands are considered to represent one of the largest biological carbon pools and decisively affect global carbon cycling [1]. The inland salt marsh is a marsh wetland with over-wet or seasonal water, salinized soil, and halophytes in continental arid and semi-arid climates [2]. The inland salt marsh is a type of wetland ecosystem that exhibits specific ecological and hydrological processes and a highly heterogeneous environment [3]. Salt marsh has a special water-saturated anaerobic environment, which is characterized by high species diversity, high local productivity, high carbon burial rate, and low carbon decomposition rate [4]. Carbon sequestration in the salt marsh is an important part of the wetland carbon sink. The carbon capacity of salt marsh is stronger than that of other vegetation ecosystems in arid areas, and it is very sensitive to regional and global climate change [5]. To study the influencing mechanism of carbon sequestration in the vegetation-soil system of inland salt marsh wetlands, and to provide a scientific basis for revealing the mechanism of soil organic carbon accumulation in wetlands under the background of global change.

Soil is the main carbon pool in wetlands, accounting for 95% of carbon storage [6]. Soil organic carbon (SOC) is not only an important component of wetland soil but also plays an important role in regulating wetland carbon storage, primary productivity of the wetland ecosystem, and global climate change [7]. SOC is not only an important component of wetland soils but also plays an important role in regulating carbon storage, wetland ecosystem primary productivity, and global climate change [8]. Marsh hydrology is the main driving force that maintains the development and decline of wetlands [9]. Soil active organic carbon refers to the part of soil organic carbon that transfers quickly in soil, has unstable chemical properties, is easily oxidized, decomposed, and mineralized, and its morphology and spatial location have a high impact on the activities of plants and microorganisms [10]. Soil active organic carbon refers to the unstable part of the soil that is fast-moving, has poor stability, easy to oxidation, is easy to mineralization, and is highly active to plants and soil microorganisms [11]. According to different methods of separation and determination, soil active organic carbon can be characterized in various forms: dissolved organic carbon (DOC), easily oxidized organic carbon (EOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), particulate organic carbon (POC) [12]. EOC is the first part of organic carbon to be oxidized, is the fastest turnover of soil organic carbon component, and is also a sensitive index of soil organic matter dynamic change [13]. DOC is an organic carbon source that can be directly used by soil microorganisms. It has certain solubility, moves quickly in soil, and is easy to decompose and mineralize into carbon dioxide, which is released into the atmosphere or lost in water [14]. POC refers to the fraction of soil organic carbon that is bound to sand particles (53–2000 μm in diameter), and may be further bound to soil macro-aggregates and micro-aggregates, which is susceptible to the distribution of soil particles and roots [15]. Although the proportion of soil organic carbon active components in SOC is small, the changes in these components are more sensitive than SOC and can largely characterize the changes in soil SOC content. Therefore, they are of great significance for soil carbon pool balance, soil biochemistry, and soil fertility maintenance.

Due to long-term flooding or water supersaturation, wetlands accumulate more active organic carbon and are more sensitive to climate change [16]. In recent years, domestic scholars have studied the distribution and accumulation of soil organic carbon in wetlands mainly in coastal wetlands [17], Sanjiang Plain [18], Poyang Lake [19], and Zoigai Plateau [20, 21] and different wetland types in different regions. These studies showed that at the regional scale, the size and components of the soil carbon pool varied significantly among different wetland types under the influence of hydrothermal conditions. Even in the same area, due to the differences in wetland flooding frequency and plant community type, the distribution of soil organic carbon and active carbon components is different [22]. Foreign scholars have found that the effects of different plant community types on soil organic carbon and its active carbon components are complex [23]. On the one hand, the characteristics of the plant community, litter and exudates affect the quality and quantity of soil organic carbon input, and then affect the accumulation of soil organic carbon [24]. On the other hand, differences in soil physical and chemical properties, such as soil moisture content, pH, bulk density, and total nitrogen, can also affect microbial activity, plant growth, community height, density, and biomass allocation patterns, leading to changes in soil organic carbon production [25]. An inland salt marsh wetland is a wetland ecosystem with specific ecological and hydrological processes and a highly heterogeneous environment [26]. Soil organic carbon and its active carbon components have a profound impact on the ecosystem services of salt marshes by affecting the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of soil [27]. There are few reports on soil organic carbon and its active carbon components under halophyte communities in inland salt marsh ecosystems, especially the processes and mechanisms affecting soil organic carbon and its active carbon components in salt marsh wetlands are not clear. Therefore, the study of soil organic carbon composition characteristics and influencing factors of different plant communities in inland salt marsh wetlands can clarify the impact of vegetation community types on wetland carbon sink function, and provide the scientific basis for the protection and restoration of inland salt marsh wetlands.

Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland is a typical salt marsh wetland in Lanzhou, which has a remarkable ecological function, special protection value and high scientific research value. The study area is rich in plant species, mainly salt-tolerant and salt-secreting plants. Among them, Phragmites australis (PA), Tamarix ramosissima (TR), Salicornia europaea (SE), and Suaeda corniculata (SC) are the typical vegetation communities in the salt marsh. Each plant community is dominated by a certain species, with few associated species, forming a single vegetation-type wetland with a simple structure. The transformation and distribution of soil organic carbon and active carbon components in wetland ecosystems are closely related to hydrological processes and vegetation types. At present, many scholars have studied the ecosystem service trade-offs [28], Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of habitat quality in the Qinwangchuan wetland [29]. It is urgent to reveal the characteristics and influencing mechanism of soil organic carbon and active carbon components of different plant communities in inland salt marsh wetlands. Based on this, the Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland is taken as the research area, the selection of PA, SE, TR, and SC typical plant communities as the research object, analysis of different plant communities 0–50 cm soil organic carbon and carbon content of the active component. Pearson correlation and path analysis to explore the rational soil physical and chemical effects on soil organic carbon and active carbon components. Hypotheses were as follows. (1) Soil organic carbon and active carbon components were different in different plant communities. (2) Soil organic carbon difference and active carbon components were affected by vegetation community and soil factors. (3) There are direct and indirect effects of factors on the change of soil organic carbon and active carbon components. It is helpful to reveal the stability of the soil carbon pool in salt marsh and its influencing mechanisms and provide data support for maintaining the function of the inland salt marsh ecosystem.

Methods

Study sites and sampling

Qinwangchuan Basin is located in the transition zone between the desert grassland area in the north and the typical grassland vegetation area in the middle of the Loess Plateau. It is the largest alluvial plateau basin in Lanzhou (Fig. 1). The overall topography is high in the north and low in the south, and the altitude is between 1800 and 2300 m. Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland is an overflow area of natural precipitation in the Qinwangchuan Basin, irrigation water is diverted into the Qin Project and groundwater is underflow. After long-term climatic and hydrological processes and water environment effects, rare inland salt marshes in the Loess Plateau of the Longzhong region have been gradually developed, which is representative and typical of the arid and semi-arid salt marshes ecosystem in northwest China. Qinwangchuan National Wetland Park is 103°36ʹ28″—103°40ʹ13″E, 36°24ʹ52″-36°28ʹ44″N, located in the transitional zone between arid desert and Tengger Desert. The average annual temperature of the region is 6.9 ℃, the annual sunshine time is 2700 h, the average frost-free period is 126 days, the average annual rainfall is 265 mm, and the average annual evaporation is 1879 mm. It has a continental arid climate. The main plants in the Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland are Suaeda corniculata, Salicornia europaea, Phragmites australis, Tamarix ramosissima, Salsola collina, Atriplex patens, Tripolium vulgare and Sonchus oleraceus.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Locations of measured plots and the study area

Full size image

Experimental method and design

Based on field investigation, the relatively flat surface area in Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland was selected as the sample site in September 2021. According to the different dominant species of plant communities in the plots, three typical halophyte communities (PA, SE, and SC) with similar topography, elevation, slope and aspect were selected, and three 10 m × 10 m plots were set for each community. Five 1 m × 1 m quadrats were set in each plot of PA, SC, and SE. five 2 m × 2 m quadrats were set in each plot of TR. A vegetation survey was conducted on four typical halophyte communities, including plant height, coverage and density, and aboveground biomass was collected.

The soil samples were collected in each quadrat, and the soil samples were collected in layers of 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, and 30–50 cm with a soil sampler (with a diameter of 5 cm). The soil in the same layer was mixed into one soil sample. The collected soil samples were placed in sterile ziplock bags, quickly placed in sealed ice pack containers for cold storage, and then brought back to the laboratory for storage at 4 ℃. Then, two treatment samples were prepared. A part of the soil samples was used to determine soil organic carbon and its active carbon components. Soil organic carbon (SOC) was determined by the high-temperature external thermal potassium dichromate oxidation-capacity method. Soil-dissolved organic carbon (DOC) was determined by 0.5 mol·L−1K2SO4 extraction [30]. Easily oxidized organic carbon (EOC) was determined by the potassium permanganate oxidation-colorimetric method. Particulate organic carbon (POC) was determined by the sodium hexametaphosphate dispersion method [31]. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was determined by chloroform fumigation extraction [32]. The remaining samples were routinely processed and stored in sealed bottles after passing through a 2 mm sieve for analysis of other soil's physical and chemical properties. Soil pH was measured by a PHS-3 pH meter (ELTA32, Mettler-Toledo, Germany). At the same time, the ring knife soil was collected, and the fresh weight was weighed. After drying and weighing, the soil water content (SWC) and soil bulk density (SBD) were calculated. Total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were determined by a German Vario EL III elemental analyzer.

Data analysis

One-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons (α = 0.05) were performed for soil indexes in each soil layer of different plant communities. Duncan’s test was used as a statistical test. Dunnett’s T3 test was used for the statistical test when the data did not meet the homogeneity of variance. Pearson correlation analysis was conducted for soil physical and chemical properties and carbon component indexes. Soil physical and chemical properties include SWC, SBD, EC, pH, TN, TP (Table 1). The stepwise regression analysis method was used to establish the multiple regression equation of soil factors to each component's organic carbon content. The influence degree and relative contribution of each factor to soil organic carbon and its active carbon components were compared and analyzed. Data processing and analysis were carried out in Excel 2003 and SPSS 22.0, and plotting was completed in Origin 2019 software.

Table 1 Common parameters and their abbreviations
Full size table

Results

Characteristics of soil physicochemical properties of different vegetation communities

The soil physicochemical indexes showed significant changes under different soil layers of four plant communities in salt marsh wetlands (Table 2). SWC in 0–50 cm soil from high to low was PA(39.54 ± 1.32%) > SE(33.71 ± 1.95%) > SC(23.26 ± 1.04%) > TR (21.66 ± 1.56%). The SWC of different soil layers under the same vegetation community was different and the SWC of each vegetation community showed an increasing trend with the increase of soil depth. The SBD of different soil layers in different vegetation communities was different, and ranged from 1.36 g/m2 to 2.15 g/m2. The SBD of 0–50 cm soil from high to low was TR (2.03 ± 0.05 g/m2) > PA (1.57 ± 0.02 g/m2) > SC(1.51 ± 0.02 g/m2) > SE(1.38 ± 0.03 g/m2)(Table 2). The SBD of each community decreased with the increase of soil depth. The soil salinity of 0–50 cm in the SE community was relatively high, with a value of 21.43 ± 0.31 g/kg, while that of the TR community was low, with a value of 6.72 ± 0.31 g/kg. EC in each community decreased with the increase in soil depth. Soil pH values ranged from 6.53 to 7.81, and the soil pH values of the SE community were significantly lower than those of the other three plant communities, and the differences among the other three plant communities were small. TN content in 0–50 cm soil from high to low was SE (0.38 ± 0.01) > SC (0.37 ± 0.01) > PA(0.35 ± 0.01) > TR (0.29 ± 0.01), and TN in SC and SE community was higher in 10–30 cm. TN in PA and TR was higher at 0–10 cm. Soil total phosphorus (TP) content in 0–50 cm soil from high to low was SE (0.56 ± 0.01) > SC (0.55 ± 0.01) > PA (0.54 ± 0.01) > TR (0.53 ± 0.01). There was little difference in soil TP among vegetation communities.

Table 2 Soil physical and chemical properties of the four vegetation communities in salt marsh wetland
Full size table

Analysis of biological characteristics of different plant communities

There were significant differences in the biological characteristics of different vegetation communities in the Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland (Table 3) (P < 0.05). The FVC of each vegetation type ranged from 74.27% to 88.60%, and the plant average height (AH), coverage (FVC), and aboveground biomass (UB) of TR and PA communities were relatively high. The density (D) of the TR community was relatively low, with a value of 0.46 branch·m−2. The AH and UB of SC and SE communities were relatively low and the density was relatively high, which were 160.13 branch·m−2 and 105.27 branch·m−2, respectively.

Table 3 Biological characteristics of four typical vegetation communities in salt marsh wetland (mean ± SE)
Full size table

Characteristics of soil organic carbon and active carbon components under different vegetation communities

Characteristics of soil organic carbon under different vegetation communities

Figure 2 shows that there are significant differences in soil organic carbon among the four vegetation communities in the salt marsh wetland (P < 0.05). From high to low soil organic carbon (SOC) in 0–50 cm soil was PA (9.60 ± 0.32 g/kg) > SE (7.75 ± 0.18g/kg) > TR (4.96 ± 0.18 g/kg) > SC (4.55 ± 0.11 g/kg). The SOC values of the PA community in 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, and 30–50 cm soil layers were 13.04 ± 0.45 g/kg, 10.58 ± 0.36 g/kg and 5.19 ± 0.24 g/kg, respectively. The SOC of the TR community was 0–10 cm (5.63 ± 0.26 g/kg) > 10–30 cm (4.65 ± 0.18 g/kg) > 30–50 cm (3.79 ± 0.18 g/kg) in vertical profile. In the vertical profile, the soil organic carbon content of the PA and TR communities decreased with the increase in soil depth. The SOC values of the SE community was 30–50 cm (7.81 ± 0.20 g/kg) > 0–10 cm (7.77 ± 0.20 g/kg) > 10–30 cm (7.66 ± 0.17 g/kg) in descending order. The SOC values of the SC community were lower in 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, and 30–50 cm soil layers, which were 4.57 ± 0.13 g/kg, 4.32 ± 0.12 g/kg, and 4.76 ± 0.10 g/kg, respectively. In the vertical profile, the SOC of the SE and SC community decreased first and then increased with the increase of soil depth.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Characteristics of soil organic carbon content in different vegetation communities in Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences among plots (p < 0.05). SC Suaeda corniculata, SE, Salicornia europaea, TR Tamarix ramosissima, PA Phragmites australis

Full size image

Characteristics of soil active organic carbon components under different vegetation communities

Soil dissolved organic carbon (DOC), easily oxidized organic carbon (EOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), and soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) were significantly different among the four plantation communities (Fig. 3). Figure 3a shows that the DOC in 0–50 cm vegetation community was as follows PA (0.46 ± 0.01 g/kg) > TR (0.34 ± 0.01 g/kg) > SE (0.22 ± 0.01 g/kg) > SC (0.21 ± 0.01 g/kg). In the vertical section, DOC of the SC community was 0–10 cm (0.27 ± 0.02 g/kg) > 10–30 cm (0.21 ± 0.01 g/kg) > 30–50 cm (0.16 ± 0.01 g/kg). The DOC values of the SE community in 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm and 30–50 cm soil layers were 0.25 ± 0.02 g/kg, 0.17 ± 0.01 g/kg and 0.23 ± 0.01 g/kg, respectively. The DOC of the PA and TR communities was lower in the 0–10 cm soil layer, and its value was 0.39 ± 0.01 g/kg and 0.25 ± 0.02 g/kg, respectively. The DOC of the PA and TR communities was higher in the 30–50 cm soil layer. Their values were 0.56 ± 0.01 g/kg and 0.47 ± 0.01 g/kg, respectively. In the vertical profile, the DOC of the PA and TR community increased with the increase in soil depth (Fig. 3a). The EOC in 0–50 cm vegetation community showed TR (3.01 ± 0.05 g/kg) > SE (2.67 ± 0.07 g/kg) > SC (1.45 ± 0.07 g/kg) > PA (1.36 ± 0.04 g/kg) (Fig. 3b).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Active carbon components of soil organic carbon under different vegetation in Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland (a, DOC. b, EOC.c, MBC. d, POC). Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences among plots (p < 0.05). SC Suaeda corniculata, SE Salicornia europaea, TR Tamarix ramosissima, PA Phragmites australis. For definition of the parameter abbreviations see Table 1

Full size image

The MBC in 0–50 cm vegetation community showed PA (0.31 ± 0.01 g/kg) > SC (0.29 ± 0.01 g/kg) > SE (0.17 ± 0.01 g/kg) > TR (0.16 ± 0.01 g/kg) (Fig. 3c). The MBC of the SE community was different in 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, and 30–50 cm soil layers, and the values were 0.18 ± 0.01 g/kg, 0.16 ± 0.01 g/kg and 0.17 ± 0.01 g/kg, respectively. The MBC of the SC community was 0–10 cm (0.41 ± 0.01g/kg) > 10–30 cm (0.29 ± 0.02 g/kg) > 30–50 cm (0.18 ± 0.01 g/kg). The microbial biomass carbon (MBC) of the PA community was significantly higher in the 0–10 cm surface layer than in the 10–30 cm and 30–50 cm soil layers, and decreased with the increase of soil depth. The MBC of the TR community was different in 0–10 cm, 10–30 cm, and 30–50 cm soil layers, and the values were 0.18 ± 0.01 g/kg, 0.17 ± 0.01 g/kg, and 0.14 ± 0.01 g/kg, respectively (Fig. 3c). The particulate organic carbon (POC) in 0–50 cm vegetation community was showed PA (2.81 ± 0.06 g/kg) > TR (2.27 ± 0.06 g/kg) > SC (2.19 ± 0.08 g/kg) > SE (2.01 ± 0.07 g/kg). In the vertical profile, EOC and POC decreased with the increase of soil depth (Fig. 3d).

Analysis of influencing factors of soil organic carbon and active carbon components

Correlation analysis of soil organic carbon and active carbon components with vegetation community and soil factors

Figure 4 shows the effects of soil physical and chemical properties and vegetation community characteristics on SOC and active carbon components by Pearson correlation analysis. The influencing factors of soil organic carbon and carbon components are quite different, and the influencing factors of the same carbon component are also different in different soil layers (Fig. 4). SOC was positively correlated with DOC, POC, and MBC. SOC greatly affected the soil's active organic carbon content, and SOC was negatively correlated with EOC. SOC in 0–50 cm soil layer was positively correlated with SWC, TN, TP, D, FVC, and UB (P < 0.01), and the correlation decreased with the increase in soil depth. There was a significant negative correlation between SOC and SBD (P < 0.01), and the correlation between SOC and SBD increased with the increase in soil depth. SOC was not significantly correlated with pH and plant height in 0–10 cm and 10–30 cm soil layers, but was significantly negatively correlated with pH and plant height in 30–50 cm soil layers (P < 0.01). Soil factors significantly related to active carbon components were more in 0–10 cm and 10–30 cm, and the significantly related factors gradually decreased with the increase of soil depth. DOC was positively correlated with SWC, TN, D, FVC and UB (P < 0.01), and the correlation decreased with the increase of soil depth. There was a significant negative correlation between DOC and EC (P < 0.01), and the correlation was enhanced with the increase in soil depth. EOC was positively correlated with SBD and FVC (P < 0.05), and the correlation decreased with the increase in soil depth. POC was positively correlated with TP, AD, FVC and UB, and negatively correlated with EC in 0–10 cm and 10–30 cm soil. The environmental factors significantly related to POC and EOC decreased with the increase in soil depth.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Correlation analysis of soil organic carbon and active carbon components with vegetation community and soil factors. *p < 0.05 (bilateral); **p < 0.01 (bilateral). For a definition of the parameter abbreviations see Table 1

Full size image

Decomposition effects of vegetation and soil factors on soil organic carbon and active carbon components

Due to the strong correlation between soil factors, collinearity may occur during regression analysis, and the variation range of the quantity of each soil factor is different. Therefore, stepwise regression analysis cannot directly reflect the contribution of each environmental factor to the content of soil organic carbon and active carbon components. The path coefficient was calculated by the method of the standardized regression coefficient. The correlation coefficient was decomposed into direct path coefficient and indirect path coefficient, which could directly reflect the influence of various environmental factors on soil organic carbon and active carbon components. The statistical regression model of soil organic carbon, active carbon components and other soil factors was obtained by stepwise regression analysis (1) – (5):

$${\text{SOC}} = {24}.{51} + 0.00{\text{8SWC}} - {2}.{\text{319SBD}} + 0.{\text{126EC}} - 0.{\text{747pH}} + {1}0.{\text{786TN}} - {32}.{\text{64TP}} + 0.00{\text{1D}} - 0.00{\text{5FVC}} + 0.00{\text{3UB}}$$
(1)
$${\text{MBC}} = - {1}.{141} - 0.00{\text{1SWC}} - 0.00{\text{3SBD}} + 0.0{\text{84pH}} + {1}.{1}0{\text{8TN}} + 0.{\text{549TP}}$$
(2)
$${\text{DOC}} = - 0.0{28} + 0.00{\text{2SWC}} + 0.0{\text{32SBD}} - 0.0{\text{17 pH}} - 0.0{\text{5 TN}} + 0.{\text{455 TP}}$$
(3)
$${\text{EOC}} = {3}.{721} + 0.00{\text{4SWC}} + 0.{\text{983SBD}} + 0.0{\text{18EC}} - 0.{\text{835pH}} - {3}.{\text{346TN}} + {6}.{\text{337TP}} - 0.00{\text{4D}} + 0.00{\text{8 FVC}}$$
(4)
$${\text{POC}} = {3}.{721} + 0.00{\text{4SWC}} + 0.{\text{983SBD}} - 0.{\text{118PH}} - {3}.{\text{346TN}} + {6}.{\text{337TP}} - 0.00{\text{4D}} + 0.00{\text{8FVC}}$$
(5)

The correlation between vegetation community characteristics, soil factors, and SOC content was in the order of SWC > UB > D > FVC > SBD > TN > pH > TP > EC (Table 4). The direct path coefficients of UB and TP are both larger than their connected path coefficients, indicating that the main contribution of UB and TP to SOC content is the direct effect. UB has the largest direct effect on SOC and shows a positive effect, while TP has the largest direct negative effect on SOC. The indirect path coefficient of SOC, SWC, SBD, EC, PH, TN, FVC, and other factors is greater than its direct path coefficient. The results showed that SWC, SBD, EC, PH, TN and other environmental factors contributed to SOC content mainly through the indirect effect of affecting other factors. SWC, SBD, EC, and PH mainly have indirect negative effects through UB and indirect positive effects through TP. TN has an indirect positive effect through UB and a negative effect through TP.

Table 4 Decomposition of the simple correlation coefficient between soil organic carbon and vegetation-soil factors in a salt marsh wetland
Full size table

It can be seen from Table 5 that the correlation between soil factors and MBC content from large to small was TN > SWC > SBD > TP > pH. The direct path coefficients of TN and pH are both larger than the connected path coefficients, indicating that the main contribution of TN and pH to MBC content is the direct effect, and the effect is positive. The indirect path coefficients of SWC, SBD, and TP were larger than those of their direct path coefficients, indicating that the main contribution of SWC, SBD, and TP to MBC content was an indirect effect through influencing other factors. SWC and SBD have indirect negative effects mainly through pH, TN, and D. TN has an indirect positive effect through D.

Table 5 Decomposition of the simple correlation coefficient between soil active organic carbon components and vegetation-soil factors in saltmarsh wetland
Full size table

The correlation between soil factors and DOC content was EC > SWC > pH > SBD > TN > TP (Table 5). The direct path coefficient of TP was greater than the connected path coefficient, indicating that the main contribution of TP to DOC content was a direct effect and a positive effect. The indirect path coefficients of EC, SWC, pH, SBD, and TN were larger than those of their direct path coefficients, indicating that the main contribution of EC, SWC, pH, SBD, and TN to DOC content was indirect effect by influencing other factors. Among them, EC, SWC, pH and SBD mainly produce indirect negative effects through TP, while TN produces indirect positive effects through TP (Table 5).

The correlations of vegetation community characteristics, soil physicochemical factors with EOC content and POC content were as follows D > pH > FVC > SBD > TN > TP > SWC > EC (Table 5). The direct path coefficients of PH and D on EOC and POC were larger than the connected path coefficients, indicating that the main contribution of PH and D to EOC and POC content was the direct effect, and both showed a negative effect. The indirect path coefficients of SWC, SBD, EC, TN, TP, and FVC were larger than their direct path coefficients, indicating that the main contribution of these factors to EOC content was indirect effect through influencing other factors. SWC, SBD and EC have indirect positive effects by influencing PH and D, while TN, TP and FVC have indirect negative effects by influencing PH. In general, the interaction between vegetation community characteristics and soil physical and chemical factors jointly affected the content of soil organic carbon and its active components.

Discussion

Different salt marsh wetland vegetation types of soil organic carbon and active carbon components characteristics

Soil organic carbon mainly comes from the return of plant litter elements and the metabolism of root exudates [33]. The quality and quantity of soil organic carbon input are different due to the difference in aboveground biomass, litter, and exudate. It directly or indirectly determines the decomposition rate and decomposition mode of soil organic carbon, and eventually leads to the change of soil organic carbon and active carbon components [34]. This study found that soil organic carbon content showed the order of PA > SE > TR > SC community (Fig. 2). Plant community characteristics (FVC, D, and UB) were significantly positively correlated with SOC (P < 0.05), and UB had the largest direct positive effect on SOC (Fig. 4), which was consistent with Nie [35]. Wetland plant Phragmites australis is the dominant species in the study area. PA has the characteristics of high carbon input and low carbon output, high productivity and salinity tolerance. The wetland is in a wet water-saturated state, which inhibits the decomposition of organic matter and has a large effect on soil carbon sequestration. In addition, the FVC, D, and UB of the PA community were significantly higher than those of other vegetation communities (Table 3). This provides more litter to the soil and increases the content of organic carbon and active carbon components in the soil, which is consistent with the results of Gou [36]. The growth and development of plant communities play an important role in soil organic carbon. The relative deposition of soil under the flourishing growth of vegetation and the return of vegetation litter into the soil is conducive to the preservation of soil nutrients and the accumulation of wetland soil organic carbon. Soil organic carbon in TR and PA communities was concentrated in the soil surface layer (0–10 cm), and soil organic carbon content decreased with the increase of soil depth (Fig. 2). This is because the 0–10 cm depth soil layer has a large accumulation of plant litter, a high input of organic matter decomposition, and strong microbial activity. With the increase in soil depth, the input of litter decreased, the microbial activities decreased sharply, and the organic carbon content began to decrease significantly. The significant positive correlations between plant community characteristics (FVC, D, and UB) and soil organic carbon (P < 0.05) decreased with the increase in soil depth (Fig. 4), which was consistent with the results of Mukhopadhyay [37]. SOC in SE and SC communities showed an inverted V-shaped distribution, with the highest content in the 10–30 cm soil layer (Fig. 2). Because the roots of SC and SE are mainly concentrated in the soil of 10–30 cm, the roots intertwine with each other and connect root particles to release secretions, which leads to changes in the nature of rhizosphere soil and affects soil aggregation. In addition, a large number of dead roots provide rich carbon sources for the soil. This is similar to the research results of Zi [38], the denser the plant roots are distributed, the higher the content of organic carbon in the soil of 10–30 cm soil layer.

Soil active organic carbon is an important part of soil organic carbon, which can reflect the sensitivity of the soil carbon pool. The plant community injects photosynthally fixed organic carbon into soil through litter, turnover of fine roots, and root exudates [39, 40]. The quantity and quality of litter transported to the soil by different vegetation types and the root exudates were different, resulting in significant differences in soil active carbon components (MBC, EOC, DOC, and POC) in different soil layers of different plant communities [41]. The contents of soil active carbon components MBC, DOC and POC in the PA community were higher (Fig. 3). This is mainly because the PA community is located in the seasonally flooded waterlogged swamp area, where vegetation is flourishing and more litter provides a large amount of carbon source for soil microorganisms. Moreover, the soil permeability is relatively good, which promotes the propagation of microorganisms and can significantly increase MBC. DOC is a source of organic carbon that can be used directly by soil microbes. It moves quickly through the soil and is easily broken down and mineralized, so it is easily lost [42]. Flooding can improve the dissolution of soil organic carbon and lead to the dispersion of aggregates, thus increasing the amount of dissolved organic carbon. DOC increases with increasing soil depth, possibly because DOC includes different orders of organic matter suspended and deposited in soil solutions. On the one hand, many large organic combinations of soil particles and plant litter are enriched in the soil surface, and their decomposition ability is relatively weak, and the accumulation and conversion rate of DOC in the soil is low. On the other hand, the leaching effect of soil and the evaporation effect of deep soil was weak, which enhanced the adsorption and retention of DOC in deep soil, this is consistent with the conclusions of Liu [43]. The higher the particulate organic carbon, the higher the unstable part of soil organic carbon. Due to differences in plant communities, root distribution, water status, pH value, and SOC, the distribution of MBC, DOC and POC in soil layers was also different, which was consistent with the results of Guan and Sainepo [10, 44]. The SWC of the TR community is low, soil litter input is relatively less, SOC is easy to oxidized, and microbial growth and reproduction are inhibited, with relatively few types and quantities. The contents of MBC, DOC and POC in the TR community were lower, but the EOC was significantly higher than that of other communities. This is because the spatial structure of the TR community (large crown width, high plant height, and deep litter leaf layer) not only plays a shading role on the soil under the crown, reduces the evaporation of soil water, but also reduces the loss of soil EOC caused by leaching and precipitation scouring. Leaching and leaching of topsoil erosion are the decisive factors affecting the difference of EOC. Since soil active organic carbon mainly comes from plant litter, soil humus, microorganisms, roots and their exudates, exudates produced by roots and root exudates will increase SOC content. At the same time, more distribution of surface roots and litter can provide more carbon sources for microorganisms, which is conducive to microbial growth and reproduction. With the deepening of the soil layer, soil organic carbon content and underground biomass decreased, resulting in a significant decrease in soil active organic carbon. The contents of different active organic carbon components reflected that different plant communities had a great influence on the organic carbon content of salt marsh wetlands.

Effects of soil physical and chemical properties on soil organic carbon and active carbon components

The correlation analysis showed that the correlation between soil organic carbon and the active carbon component of salt marsh wetland reached a significant level (P < 0.01), indicating that soil active organic carbon was largely dependent on SOC. SOC was significantly positively correlated with the contents of MBC, DOC, and POC (P < 0.01), and negatively correlated with EOC. The correlation intensity between soil organic carbon and active carbon components in different soil layers was different, which was consistent with the conclusion of Xu [45]. The difference in soil physical and chemical properties can also lead to a change of the soil organic carbon production by affecting microbial activity and the soil organic carbon mineralization process. It was found that SOC, DOC, POC, and MBC were positively correlated with SWC and TN, and negatively correlated with SBD. This is mainly because of the increase of soil moisture for plant litter decomposition and soil microbial activity, which would be helpful to the accumulation of soil organic carbon components together [46]. The higher the soil moisture content, and soil aeration, the less number of aerobic bacteria, SOC mineralization process is abated, the organic material input is greater than the output, the long-term accumulation of soil organic carbon content increased [29, 47]. On the other hand, water also has indirect effects on soil organic carbon and active carbon components by affecting plant distribution and biomass size. The influence of nitrogen on soil organic carbon is mainly achieved by controlling the rate of organic carbon mineralization and plant growth. It is found that TN is significantly positively correlated with SOC and POC, and has a strong direct positive effect on MBC content. This is mainly because the increase of total nitrogen will promote plant growth and lead to the increase of nitrogen content in plant leaves, which will reduce the C/N ratio of litter, thus promoting the decomposition of litter, and eventually affecting the content of organic carbon in the soil. Secondly, TN can promote a significant increase in plant leaf length and leaf width in the short term, and then increase the quantity and quality of litter, increasing organic matter input. TN is positively correlated with organic carbon and active carbon components, which is consistent with the conclusion reached by Lu [48]. SBD is an important index reflecting soil's physical state. Higher SBD leads to lower soil porosity, resulting in worse soil permeability and aeration, which is not conducive to the survival of microorganisms and the growth of plant roots, and reduces the input of litter, thus affecting the content of organic carbon in the soil. SBD was significantly negatively correlated with SOC and MBC, which was consistent with the conclusions of Yan [49]. PH has a strong direct effect on SOC and active carbon components, and pH is significantly negatively correlated with SOC, MBC and EOC, which is consistent with the existing research conclusions of Huang [50] (Tables 4 and 5). PH directly affects the type, quantity and activity of soil microorganisms, thus affecting the soil carbon conversion process. Microorganisms are only suitable for activities in a neutral environment. Too high or too low PH will have adverse effects on the growth and reproduction of microorganisms, affect the normal growth of plants, reduce the input of litter, and then affect the content of soil organic carbon and active carbon components. PH directly affects the type, quantity and activity of soil microorganisms, thus affecting soil carbon conversion process. The difference in TP between different vegetation types is relatively small, which may be related to the poor migration of phosphorus itself and the easy existence of phosphorus in the soil as a deposition form. Soil organic carbon and active organic carbon content were positively correlated with TP content, but the correlation was not significant, which was similar to Jin’s research results [51]. The indirect effects of SWC, SBD, and EC on the contents of SOC, MBC, DOC, EOC, and POC by influencing other factors are similar to the research results of other scholars in Spohn [52] (Table 5). The difference in vegetation community characteristics and the interaction between soil physicochemical factors are the important factors driving the variation of soil organic carbon and active carbon components in different plant communities in salt marsh wetlands.

Conclusions

There were significant differences in soil organic carbon and active organic carbon among different plant communities in the Qinwangchuan salt marsh wetland. Soil organic carbon content was PA (9.60 g/kg) > SE (7.75 g/kg) > CL (4.96 g/kg) > SC (4.55 g/kg), and DOC, POC, and MBC in the PA community was significantly higher than those in SE, CL and SC communities. In the vertical profile, SOC, DOC, POC, and MBC contents in the 0–10 cm soil layer were significantly higher than those in the 10–30 cm and 30–50 cm soil layers. There was a significant positive correlation between SOC and DOC, POC and MBC, and a negative correlation between SOC and EOC. SOC was positively correlated with vegetation community characteristics (height, coverage, density, and biomass) and soil environment (SWC, TN, TP, D, FVC, UB), but was negatively correlated with SBD as soil depth increased. There were differences in the correlation between soil active carbon components, vegetation community characteristics, and soil physicochemical properties in different soil layers. The results showed that the factors affecting the change of soil organic carbon and the stability of the carbon pool were complicated. In soil organic carbon protection, more attention should be paid to the improvement of soil properties and nutrients, and the improvement of plant community status also plays a positive role in the accumulation of soil organic carbon. There are two different ways that vegetation community characteristics and soil physicochemical properties can affect soil organic carbon and its components. First, TN, TP, pH, and UB have direct effects on SOC, DOC, EOC, and POC. Second, SWC, SBD, EC, and FVC have indirect effects on SOC, DOC, EOC, and POC contents by influencing other factors, indicating that in the process of soil organic carbon change, there are not only direct effects of each influencing factor but also indirect effects among influencing factors. In summary, soil organic carbon of different wetland plant communities in inland salt marsh wetlands has significant differences, but its internal driving mechanism is more complex. Therefore, in future studies, it is necessary to consider the influence of soil microorganisms, hydrological environment, and other factors more comprehensively to reflect the change process and mechanism of wetland soil carbon pool more deeply.

Availability of data and materials

All study-related data has been provided in the supporting information.

References

  1. Bernal B, Mitsch WJ. Comparing carbon sequestration in temperate freshwater wetland communities. Glob Change Biol. 2012;18:1636–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02619.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cui Q, He TH, Zhang AN, Quan XS, Feng YQ, Chen XQ, He YS. Efects of soil salinity characteristics on three habitats in inland salt marshes. J Plant Res. 2021;2021(134):1037–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-021-01328-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Colmer TD, Colmer TD, Pedersen O, Wetson AM, Flowers TJ. Oxygen dynamics in a salt-marsh soil and in Suaeda maritima during tidal submergence. Environ Exp Bot. 2013;92:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.07.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abril G, Martinez JM, Artigas L, et al. Amazon River carbon dioxide outgassing fuelled by wetlands. Nature. 2014;505:395–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12797.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang D, Miao XY, Wang B, Jiang RP, Wen T, Liu MS, Huang C, Xu C. System-specific complex interactions shape soil organic carbon distribution in coastal salt marshes. J Plant Res. 2020;17:2037. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Han L, Wan ZM, Guo YD, Song CC, Jin SF, Zuo YJ. Estimation of soil organic carbon storage in palustrine wetlands, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:4646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Steinmuller HE, Chambers LG. Characterization of coastal wetland soil organic matter: implications for wetland submergence. Sci Total Environ. 2019;677:648–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ji H, Han JG, Xue JM, Hatten JA, Wang MH, Guo YH, Li PP. Soil organic carbon pool and chemical composition under different types of land use in wetland: implication for carbon sequestration in wetlands. Sci Total Environ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kominoski JS, Fernandez M, Breault P, Sclater V, Rothermel BB. Fire severity and post-fire hydrology drive nutrient cycling and plant community recovery in intermittent Wetlands. Ecosystems. 2022;25:265–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00653-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guan JQ, Song CX, Wu YD, Qi XT, Qu RJ, Li F, Ni HW. Responses of soil active organic carbon fractions and enzyme activities to freeze-thaw cycles in Wetlands. Wetlands. 2022;42:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-022-01553-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li R, Jiang CJ, Hao QJ. Impact of land utilization pattern on distributing characters of labile organic carbon in soil aggregates in Jinyun Mountain. Environ Sci. 2015;36(9):3429–37. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.09.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehmann J, Kleber M. The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature. 2015;528:60–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16069.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang JS, Liu WX, Yang S, Yang L, Peng ZY, Deng MF, Xu S, Zhang BB, Ahirwal J, Liu LL. Plant carbon inputs through shoot, root, and mycorrhizal pathways affect soil organic carbon turnover differently. Soil Biol Biochem. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang XQ, Li ZW, Nie XD, Huang M, Wang DY, Xiao HB, Liu C, Peng H, Jiang JY, Zeng GM. The role of dissolved organic matter in soil organic carbon stability under water erosion. Ecol Ind. 2019;102:724–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.03.038.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou S, Lin JJ, Wang P, Zhu P, Zhu B. Resistant soil organic carbon is more vulnerable to priming by root exudate fractions than relatively active soil organic carbon. Plant Soil. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05288-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dodla SK, Wang JJ, DeLaune RD. Characterization of labile organic carbon in coastal wetland soils of the Mississippi River deltaic plain: relationships to carbon functional-ities. Sci Total Environ. 2012;435–436:151–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.090.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chi Y, Liu DH, Xie ZL. Zonal simulations for soil organic carbon mapping in coastal wetlands. Ecol Ind. 2021;132:108291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.108291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiao Y, Huang ZG, Lu XG. Changes of soil labile organic carbon fractions and their relation to soil microbial characteristics in four typical wetlands of Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Ecol Eng. 2015;82:381–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ren Q, Yuan JH, Wang JP, Liu X, Ma SL, Zhou LY, Miao LJ, Zhang JC. Water level has higher influence on soil organic carbon and microbial community in Poyang Lake Wetland than vegetation type. Microorganisms. 2022;10:131. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms.10010131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang ZW, Zhao CZ, Bai X, Li Q, Ma M. Examining soil organic carbon in the mountainous peat swamps of the Zoigê plateau in China’s Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Soil Use Manag. 2023;39:757–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu X, Ma K, Zhang Y, Tang SX, Liu JG. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon in the Zoige alpine wetland, northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. CATENA. 2016;144:102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang JY, Song CC, Wang XW, Song YY. Changes in labile soil organic carbon fractions in wetland ecosystems along a latitudinal gradient in Northeast China. CATENA. 2012;96:83–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ford H, Garbutt A, Duggan-Edwards M, Pages JF, Harvey R, Ladd C, Skov MW. Large-scale predictions of salt-marsh carbon stock based on simple observations of plant community and soil type. Biogeosciences. 2019;16:425–36. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-425-2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Means MM, Ahn C, Williams AR, LD, et al. Carbon storage potential by four macrophytes as affected by planting diversity in a created wetland. J Environl Manag. 2016;165:133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dong J, Zhao D, Zhang C, Cao QQ, Fang JH, Yang RR, Ji SP, Li CC, Zhao RQ, Liu J. Factors controlling organic carbon distributions in a riverine wetland. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:34529–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09685-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ivanova K, Geneva M, Anev S, Georgieva T, Tzvetkova N, Stancheva I, Markovska Y. Effect of soil salinity on morphology and gas exchange of two Paulownia hybrids. Agroforestry. 2019;93:929–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0186-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dargie GC, Lewis SL, Lawson IT, Mitchard Edward TA, Page Susan E, Bocko Yannick E, Ifo SA. Age extent and carbon storage of the central Congo Basin peatland complex. Nature. 2017;542(7639):86–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21048.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhao T, Pan JH. Ecosystem service trade-offs and spatial non-stationary responses to influencing factors in the Loess hilly-gully region: Lanzhou City, China. Sci Total Environ. 2022;846:157422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dong JH, Zhang ZB, Liu BT, Zhang XH, Zhang WB, Chen L. Spatiotemporal variations and driving factors of habitat quality in the loess hilly area of the Yellow River Basin: a case study of Lanzhou City, China. J Arid Land. 2022;14:637–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-022-0097-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones DL, Willett VB. Experimental evaluation of methods to quantify dissolved organic nitrogen (DON) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38(5):991–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.08.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cambardella CA, Elliott ET. Particulate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1992;56(3):777–83. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1992.03615995005600030017x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu JS, Lin QM, Huang QY, et al. Soil Microbial biomass determination method and its application. Beijing: China Meteorological Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sheikh MA, Kumar M, Bussmann RW. Altitudinal variation in soil organic carbon stock in coniferous subtropical and broadleaf temperate forests in Garhwal Himalaya. Carbon Balance Manag. 2009;4:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-4-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Srabani D, Brian K, Richards KL, Krounbi L, Walter MF, Todd WM, Steenhuis TS, Lehmann J. Lower mineralizability of soil carbon with higher legacy soil moisture. Soil Biol Biochem. 2019;130:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nie YP, Chen HS, Wang KL, Ding YL. Rooting characteristics of two widely distributed woody plant species growing in different karst habitats of Southwest China. Plant Ecol. 2014;215:1099–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0369-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gou EM, Moore TR, Roulet NT. Predicting peatland carbon fluxes from non-destructive plant traits. Funct Ecol. 2017;31:1824–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mukhopadhyay S, Masto RE, Yadav A, George J, Ram LC, Shukla SP. Soil quality index for evaluation of reclaimed coal mine spoil. Sci Total Environ. 2016;542:540–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.035.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zi YY, Xi M, Fl S, Li Y, Yang L. Spatial and temporal distribution and storage of soil organic carbon in coastal wetland of jiaozhou bay. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2016;27(07):2075–83. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Huang R, Lan T, Song X, Li J, Ling J, Deng OP, Wang CQ, Gao XS, Li QQ, Tang XY, Tao Q, Zeng M. Soil labile organic carbon impacts C:N: P stoichiometry in urban park green spaces depending on vegetation types and time after planting. Appl Soil Ecol. 2021;163:103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Erkan N, Güner ST, Aydın AC. Thinning effects on stand growth, carbon stocks, and soil properties in Brutia pine plantations. Carbon Balance Manag. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-023-00226-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shao XX, Yang WY, Wu M. Seasonal dynamics of soil labile organic carbon and enzyme activities in relation to vegetation types in Hangzhou Bay tidal flat wetland. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0142677. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142677.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Smiley BP, Trofymow JA. Historical effects of dissolved organic carbon export and land management decisions on the watershed-scale forest carbon budget of a coastal British Columbia Douglas-fir-dominated landscape. Carbon Balance Manag. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0083-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu XD. Characteristics of soil active organic carbon components in different community types in desert steppe. Yinchuan: Ningxia University; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sainepo BM, Gachene CK, Karuma A. Assessment of soil organic carbon fractions and carbon management index under different land use types in Olesharo Catchment, Narok County. Kenya Carbon Balance Manag. 2018;13:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0091-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu GP, Li YQ, Shen YY, Zhang DN, Sun YJ, Zhang ZF, Zhou LW, Duan CY. Characteristics of soil organic carbon and its components in different plant communities under water level gradient in Huixian karst wetland. Guilin Environ Sci. 2019;40(3):1491–503. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.201806205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang CG, Li HX, Sun XX, Cai TJ. Responses of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities to natural restoration of reclaimed temperate marshes after abandonment. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.701610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhao F, Wu Y, Hui J, et al. Projected soil organic carbon loss in response to climate warming and soil water content in a loess watershed. Carbon Balance Manag. 2021;16:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-021-00187-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lu M, Zhou XH, Luo YQ, Yang YH, Fang CM, Chen JK, Li B. Minor stimulation of soil carbon storage by nitrogen addition: A meta-analysis. Agricult Ecosyst Environ. 2011;140:234–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.12.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yan A, Wang Z, Jiang PA, Weng PF. Effects of soil salinity on vertical distribution of soil carbon in saline soil in arid area. Arid Zone Res. 2017;34(4):770–4. https://doi.org/10.13866/j.azr.2017.04.08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huang FQH, Chen W, Sun CJ, Zhang YQ, Yang Y, Cui YR. Distribution of soil organic carbon and its influencing factors in alpine meadow of Western Tianshan Mountains. J Shaanxi Norm Univ Nat Sci. 2010. https://doi.org/10.16207/j.cnki.1009-4490.2017.03.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Jin XD, He YL, Kirumba G, Hassan Y, Li JB. Phosphorus fractions and phosphate sorption-release characteristics of the sediment in the Yangtze River estuary reservoir. Ecol Eng. 2013;55:62–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Spohn M, Babka B, Giani L. Changes in soil organic matter quality during sea-influenced marsh soil development at the North Sea coast. CATENA. 2013;107:110–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.02.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported, in part, National natural science foundation of China (Grant NO. 42361008 and NO. 41861009). We thank Robert McKenzie, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for editing the English text of a draft of this manuscript. Besides, we are very grateful to Min Ma, DaWei Wang, Xuqian Bai and Zhiwei Zhang for their assistance in the field and laboratory work.

Funding

This work was supported, in part, National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant NO. 41461013 and NO. 41861009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730070, China

    Manping Kang, ChengZhang Zhao, Min Ma & Xiaoya Li

  2. College of Geography and Environmental Science, Research Center of Wetland Resources Protection and Industrial Development Engineering of Gansu Province, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730070, China

    ChengZhang Zhao

Authors
  1. Manping Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. ChengZhang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoya Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MPK, CZZ, MM, and XYL, conceived and designed the experiments. MPK performed the experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. CZZ support in the funding acquisition, resources and critical revision of the article. MPK, XYL, and MM undertook the investigation and contributed the methodology. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChengZhang Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, M., Zhao, C., Ma, M. et al. Characteristics of soil organic carbon fractions in four vegetation communities of an inland salt marsh. Carbon Balance Manage 19, 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00248-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00248-2

Keywords

Carbon Balance and Management

ISSN: 1750-0680

Contact us