Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression results of non spatial correlation panel data econometric model of carbon sequestration cost

From: Carbon sequestration costs and spatial spillover effects in China's collective forests

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Forestry GDP

− 8.493***

− 24.873***

− 7.822***

− 25.456***

 

(− 6.935)

(− 8.753)

(− 5.914)

(− 6.817)

Wood production

− 0.081

− 3.702***

− 0.626

− 4.568***

 

(− 0.137)

(− 5.130)

(− 1.010)

(− 6.123)

Afforestation area

9.900***

1.429

11.842***

1.828*

 

(12.300)

(1.633)

(12.932)

(1.889)

Labor Price

− 0.309

− 2.558***

2.929*

− 2.178

 

(− 0.294)

(− 2.787)

(1.866)

(− 1.496)

Land use costs

34.337***

39.607***

37.198***

57.210***

 

(18.260)

(14.441)

(18.004)

(13.606)

Rural residents’ consumption

7.728***

16.576***

15.485***

19.739***

 

(5.128)

(6.875)

(4.928)

(4.336)

Forest stock

− 7.281***

− 12.033***

− 7.291***

− 11.142***

 

(− 11.530)

(− 11.610)

(− 11.462)

(− 10.635)

Population density

− 2.961***

47.994***

− 4.093***

55.289***

 

(− 4.486)

(6.321)

(− 5.281)

(6.404)

Year FE

No

No

Yes

Yes

Prov FE

No

Yes

No

Yes

N

870

870

870

870

r2

0.668

0.831

0.683

0.844

Spatial error Lagrange multiplier

0.409

Spatial error Robust Lagrange multiplier

18.284***

Spatial lag Lagrange multiplier

11.973***

Spatial lag Robust Lagrange multiplier

29.848***

  1. The significance level is *p < 0.1, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01, with t-statistic in parentheses. Year FE represents a fixed time effect, while Prov FE represents a fixed provincial effect, as shown in the following table