From: Carbon sequestration costs and spatial spillover effects in China's collective forests
 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Forestry GDP | − 8.493*** | − 24.873*** | − 7.822*** | − 25.456*** | |
 | (− 6.935) | (− 8.753) | (− 5.914) | (− 6.817) | |
Wood production | − 0.081 | − 3.702*** | − 0.626 | − 4.568*** | |
 | (− 0.137) | (− 5.130) | (− 1.010) | (− 6.123) | |
Afforestation area | 9.900*** | 1.429 | 11.842*** | 1.828* | |
 | (12.300) | (1.633) | (12.932) | (1.889) | |
Labor Price | − 0.309 | − 2.558*** | 2.929* | − 2.178 | |
 | (− 0.294) | (− 2.787) | (1.866) | (− 1.496) | |
Land use costs | 34.337*** | 39.607*** | 37.198*** | 57.210*** | |
 | (18.260) | (14.441) | (18.004) | (13.606) | |
Rural residents’ consumption | 7.728*** | 16.576*** | 15.485*** | 19.739*** | |
 | (5.128) | (6.875) | (4.928) | (4.336) | |
Forest stock | − 7.281*** | − 12.033*** | − 7.291*** | − 11.142*** | |
 | (− 11.530) | (− 11.610) | (− 11.462) | (− 10.635) | |
Population density | − 2.961*** | 47.994*** | − 4.093*** | 55.289*** | |
 | (− 4.486) | (6.321) | (− 5.281) | (6.404) | |
Year FE | No | No | Yes | Yes | |
Prov FE | No | Yes | No | Yes | |
N | 870 | 870 | 870 | 870 | |
r2 | 0.668 | 0.831 | 0.683 | 0.844 | |
Spatial error Lagrange multiplier | 0.409 | ||||
Spatial error Robust Lagrange multiplier | 18.284*** | ||||
Spatial lag Lagrange multiplier | 11.973*** | ||||
Spatial lag Robust Lagrange multiplier | 29.848*** |