Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameters were adjusted to test the relative carbon benefits of three potential wood usage scenarios

From: Modeling wood product carbon flows in southern us pine plantations: implications for carbon storage

Scenario

Parameter name

Adjusted value of parameter

% change

S1. Timber product transition: smaller logs preferred by sawmills (> CNS)

CNS produced

53,252,326 t

+ 78%

Sawtimber produced

13,313,081 t

− 56%

Large sawtimber produced

0 t

− 100%

Furniture lifespan

10 years

− 23%

Fossil fuel consumption per ton of lumber carbon produced

    Procurement

0.01986454

+ 7%

    Transportation

0.01793715

+ 7%

    Production

0.09434880

+ 7%

S2. Products are used for longer periods of time and recycled at higher rates (> Lifespan)

All product lifespans (except sanitary products, disposable food related products, packaging cartonboard, animal bedding, and landscaping)

–

+ 10%

Pallet recycling

    Recycling rate

0.8

+ 10%

    Number of times recycled

5

+ 2 times

Paper products recycling

    Corrugated boxes

0.964

+ 5%

    Sanitary products

0

–

    Packaging cartonboard

0.608

+ 40%

    Disposable food related products

0.1

+ 10%

    Miscellaneous paper products

0.181

+ 10%

    Number of times recycled

8

+ 3 times

Paper products landfilling

    Corrugated boxes

0.028

–

    Sanitary products

0.656

–

    Packaging cartonboard

0.24

− 20%

    Disposable food related products

0.719

− 10%

    Miscellaneous paper products

0.478

− 10%

C&D waste

    Downcycling to non-structural panels

0.129

+ 10%

    Landfilling

0.622

− 10%

S3. Use of potential pulpwood for bioenergy production (> Bioenergy)

Pulp logs produced

39,724,441 t

− 39%

CNS logs produced

28,680,741 t

− 4%

Sawtimber logs produced

28,680,741 t

− 4%

Large sawtimber logs produced

6,373,498 t

− 4%

Veneer logs produced

10,361,863 t

–

Pole logs produced

1,384,126 t

–

Composite logs produced

5,247,203 t

–

Bioenergy logs produced

38,072,862 t

+ 290%