Skip to main content

Table 4 Simulation Results from Scenario 2

From: The business case for carbon farming in the USA

Regions

Results from new adoption of Cover Crops

due to Carbon Farming

Results from new adoption of No-Till due to Carbon Farming

Additional Area in Cover Crops

Additional Carbon Sequestration (thousand mtCO2e)^

Additional Net Returns to Farmers (million US$)

Additional Area in No Till

Additional Carbon Sequestration (thousand mtCO2e)^

Additional Net Returns to Farmers (million US$)

Million ha

% of cropland

Million ha

% of cropland

Heartland

5.86

12.77

5,279

223.0

24.5

53.37

29,285

481.3

Northern Crescent

1.06

7.35

425

37.0

9.45

65.87

9,123

127.9

Northern Great Plains

0.61

2.23

155

47.0

7.17

26.2

4,294

124.7

Prairie Gateway

2.52

7.7

1,671

107.8

13.5

41.28

8,413

162.1

Eastern Uplands

1.35

20.76

1,394

48.6

4.72

72.54

5,406

76.6

Southern Seaboard

1.84

24.36

2,124

58.7

4.69

62.2

4,661

72.9

Fruitful Rim

1.23

10.16

1,021

50.2

6.98

57.52

5,757

77.8

Basin and Range

0.15

2.2

38

7.9

2.59

39.63

1,235

24.2

Mississippi Portal

2.93

40.93

5,543

96.2

5.18

72.44

6,613

90.5

U.S. Total

17.6

10.95

17,649

676.5

78.8

49.18

74,787

1,237.9

  1. ^Projected carbon sequestration is assumed equal to “actual” carbon sequestration in Scenario 2
  2. Source: authors’ calculation