Skip to main content

Table 3 Simulation Results from Scenario 1

From: The business case for carbon farming in the USA

Regions

2017 Cover Crop Adoption Rate (% of crop-land)

Results from new adoption of Cover Crops

due to Carbon Farming

2017 No-Till Adoption Rate (% of crop-land)

Results from new adoption of No-Till

due to Carbon Farming

Additional Area in Cover Crops

Projected Additional Carbon Sequestration (thousand mtCO2e)

Additional Net Returns to Farmers (million US$)

Additional Area in No Till

Projected Additional Carbon Sequestration, (thousand mtCO2e)

Additional Net Returns to Farmers (million US$)

Million ha

% of cropland

Million ha

% of cropland

Heartland

4.19

7.46

16.25

4,867

261.3

30.69

22.28

48.52

26,979

262.2

Northern Crescent

7.84

2.92

20.35

865

78.5

19.46

10.24

71.35

10,178

78.7

Northern Great Plains

1.47

3.04

11.12

421

130.3

34.02

9.36

34.22

5,903

132.3

Prairie Gateway

2.69

4.7

14.33

1,954

131.7

28.13

14.65

44.71

11,628

135.8

Eastern Uplands

4.66

1.18

18.14

1,077

33.7

19.03

4.48

68.86

5,771

34.4

Southern Seaboard

11.08

1.49

19.72

1,533

37.7

27.47

4.88

64.79

5,633

38.1

Fruitful Rim

3.01

2.38

19.58

754

53.3

6.25

9.14

75.28

7,593

51.9

Basin and Range

1.58

1.29

19.72

-22

25.3

17.53

4.33

66.17

2,158

27.2

Mississippi Portal

3.50

1.3

18.15

2,433

35.8

21.37

4.61

64.44

6,703

37.4

U.S. Total

3.88

25.8

16.07

13,881

787.6

26.35

83.97

52.39

82,545

797.9

  1. Sources: authors’ calculations, except for 2017 adoption rates [22]