Skip to main content

Table 4 Cluster classification and ranking of carbon sequestration potential of different plant configuration types

From: Comprehensive evaluation of carbon sequestration potential of landscape tree species and its influencing factors analysis: implications for urban green space management

Plant configuration types

Tree species

Cluster grading

Total sort

Sorting by plant configuration types

DLA1

Populus

I

1

1

DLA

P. stenoptera

II

2

2

DLA

P. acerifolia

II

3

3

ELA2

P. bungeana

III

5

4

ELA

J. formosana

III

8

5

ELA

P. orientalis

III

14

6

DLA

S. babylonica

IV

19

7

DLA

G. biloba

V

20

8

ELA

L. compactum

V

21

9

DLA

E. japonica

V

22

10

DLA

S. japonicum

V

24

11

ELA

Y. denudata

V

26

12

DLA

K. paniculata

V

27

13

ELA

C. camphora

V

28

14

ELA

S. chinensis

V

29

15

ELA

M. grandiflora

V

30

16

DLA

A. buergerianum

V

32

17

ESA3

P.serratifolia

III

4

1

ESA

O. fragrans

III

6

2

DSA4

S. oblata

III

7

3

DSA

P. Cerasifera 'Atropurpurea'

III

11

4

DSA

A. Persica 'Duplex'

III

12

5

DSA

P. Cerasys

IV

16

6

ESA

V. odoratissimum

V

23

7

DSA

C. chinensis

V

25

8

ES5

B. sinica var. parvifolia

III

9

1

ES

B. megistophylla

III

10

2

ES

L. quihoui

III

13

3

DS6

P. granatum

IV

15

4

DS

A. triloba

IV

17

5

DS

C. praecox

IV

18

6

ES

P. glabratum

V

31

7

  1. The representation of 1DLA, 2ELA, 3DSA, 4ESA, 5DS and 6ES is the same as Table 2