Skip to main content

Table 3 Photosynthetic characteristics of different plant configuration types

From: Comprehensive evaluation of carbon sequestration potential of landscape tree species and its influencing factors analysis: implications for urban green space management

Plant configuration types

CHI13 (SPAD)

Pn14 (μmol m−2 s−1)

Er15 (μmol m−2 s−1)

Ci16 (μmol mol−1)

Gs17 (μmol m−2 s−1)

M4 ± SD5

CV6

M ± SD

CV

M ± SD

CV

M ± SD

CV

M ± SD

CV

LA1

DLA7

40.39 ± 3.60

8.9%

3.80 ± 0.70

18.5%

2.55 ± 0.73

28.6%

306.45 ± 32.84

10.7%

0.09 ± 0.03

34.4%

ELA8

38.01 ± 18.11

47.6%

2.99 ± 0.86

28.9%

1.31 ± 0.73

55.8%

270.49 ± 34.11

12.6%

0.03 ± 0.02

58.9%

SA2

DSA9

38.28 ± 4.25

11.1%

5.26 ± 1.66

31.6%

3.45 ± 0.90

26.0%

296.53 ± 9.40

3.2%

0.13 ± 0.02

17.6%

ESA10

58.79 ± 6.34

10.8%

3.17 ± 1.05

23.4%

1.95 ± 1.21

40.6%

323.38 ± 63.88

22.8%

0.05 ± 0.06

17.1%

S3

DS11

46.04 ± 3.94

8.6%

5.52 ± 3.21

58.1%

3.38 ± 1.49

44.2%

265.42 ± 13.19

5.0%

0.15 ± 0.05

31.5%

ES12

54.04 ± 11.30

20.9%

3.53 ± 0.95

26.9%

1.89 ± 0.48

25.1%

250.51 ± 5.11

2.0%

0.08 ± 0.03

45.1%

  1. The representation of 1LA, 2SA, 3S, 4 M, 5SD, 6CV, 7DLA, 8ELA, 9DSA, 10ESA, 11DS and 12ES is the same as Table 2; 13CHI, 14Pn, 15Er, 16 Ci and 17Gs represent ‘Chlorophyll content’, ‘photosynthetic rate’, ‘transpiration rate’, ‘stomatal conductance’ and ‘intercellular CO2 concentration’, respectively