Skip to main content

Table 1 The differences in C storage (t C ha−1) and NPP (t ha−1 yr−1) (mean ± standard deviation) of four subtropical secondary forests calculated in 2030 and 2060 between current and the future climate scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, p < 0.001)

From: Stand carbon storage and net primary production in China’s subtropical secondary forests are predicted to increase by 2060

Forest type

C storage in 2030

C storage in 2060

NPP in 2030

NPP in 2060

RCP4.5

RCP8.5

RCP4.5

RCP8.5

RCP4.5

RCP8.5

RCP4.5

RCP8.5

EBF

4.33 ± 0.45a

4.33 ± 0.45a

5.87 ± 0.57a

6.41 ± 0.63a

0.13 ± 0.02b

0.14 ± 0.02b

0.09 ± 0.01b

0.10 ± 0.01b

DEF

4.47 ± 0.78a

4.47 ± 0.78a

6.81 ± 0.97a

7.54 ± 0.99a

0.20 ± 0.01a

0.22 ± 0.01a

0.15 ± 0.01a

0.17 ± 0.01a

DBF

4.62 ± 0.32a

4.62 ± 0.32a

7.31 ± 0.54a

8.13 ± 0.92a

0.20 ± 0.01a

0.22 ± 0.01a

0.17 ± 0.01a

0.18 ± 0.05a

CDF

2.11 ± 0.11b

2.11 ± 0.11b

3.71 ± 0.15b

4.15 ± 0.16b

0.10 ± 0.01b

0.12 ± 0.01b

0.10 ± 0.00b

0.11 ± 0.00b

  1. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.001), and the same letters indicate no significant differences
  2. EBF evergreen broad-leaved forest, DEF deciduous and evergreen broad-leaved mixed forest, DBF deciduous broad-leaved forest, CDF coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest