Skip to main content

Table 3 SOC sequestration to 30 cm depth by tillage sequence relative to expected cost for geologic CO2 storage

From: What might it cost to increase soil organic carbon using no-till on U.S. cropland?

Upper and lower marginal cost for geologic CO2 storage ($Mg−1CO2)

Tillage sequencea considered in model

Total

CTCTNT

CTRTNT

RTCTNT

RTRTNT

NCCTNT

NCRTNT

SOC storage (Tg CO2 year−1)

 

 < $36.36

75.1

4.2

0.00

0.1

9.0

0.7

89

 < $86.06

95.7

19.1

0.02

0.8

11.7

2.5

130

Proportion of SOC storage for less than the MC

 

 < $36.36

84.3%

4.7%

0.00%

0.1%

10.1%

0.8%

1

 < $86.06

73.7%

14.7%

0.02%

0.6%

9.0%

1.9%

1

Proportion of total annual potential SOC storage (2803 Tg CO2)

 

 < $36.36

53.5%

3.0%

0.00%

0.1%

6.4%

0.5%

63.5%

 < $86.06

68.2%

13.6%

0.02%

0.6%

8.4%

1.8%

92.6%

  1. aCTCTNT = Conventional tillage (CT) in 1982, CT in 1997 and no-till (NT) in 2017; CTRTNT = CT in 1982, reduced tillage (RT) in 1997 and NT in 2017; CTNTNT = CT in 1982, NT in 1997 and NT in 2017; RTCTNT = RT in 1982, CT in 1997 and NT in 2017; RTRTNT = RT in 1982, RT in 1997 and NT in 2017; RTNTNT = RT in 1982, NT in 1997 and NT in 2017; NCCTNT = Non-cropland (NC, e.g., hay, pasture, etc.) in 1982, NT in 1997 and NT in 2017; NCRTNT = NC in 1982, RT in 1997 and NT in 2017; NCNTNT = NC in 1982, NT in 1997 and NT in 2017