Informing urban climate planning with high resolution data: the Hestia fossil fuel CO2 emissions for Baltimore, Maryland

Table 5 A comparison of electricity FFCO₂ emissions between Baltimore’s SRI and Hestia-Baltimore

Electricity producing facility	Baltimore SRI for 2014 (CO₂ in t C)	Hestia-Baltimore for 2014 (t C)	Relative Mean Difference (%)
Gould Street	3609.8	3243.6	− 10.7
Philadelphia	5216.9	4797.7	− 8.4
Westport	1449.3	1479.1	2.0
Wheelabrator Baltimore Refuse	75,773.5	91,614.4	18.9
Trigen Leadenhall St^a	11,723.5	0	− 200
Trigen North Central Ave^b	5194.0	N/A	− 200
Total	102,967.0	101,134.8	− 1.8%

Electricity producing facilities in Baltimore’s self-reported inventory (SRI) emissions for the year 2014 were matched to emissions from Hestia-Baltimore v1.6 from 2014. Note that some facilities that were included in the Hestia-Baltimore emissions (Tables 3 and 4), such as the Domino Sugar facility, are not included in this table, but may be included in other sectors in the SRI (e.g., industrial)
^aReported as an industrial point facility in Hestia-Baltimore, not an electricity producing facility, named ‘Veolia Energy Baltimore Heating, LLP-Spring Gardens’. No carbon monoxide emissions were reported for this facility in the 2011 NEI so there are no FFCO₂ emissions in any year
^bNo matching facility was included in the Hestia-Baltimore data

ISSN: 1750-0680