Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of biomass estimates measured in the Legacy Tree Database and predictions by three allometric biomass equations for the Legacy trees: local allometrics presented in this study, Jenkins et al. [11], and the Forest Inventory and Analysis Component Ratio Method (FIA-CRM)

From: Variability and uncertainty in forest biomass estimates from the tree to landscape scale: the role of allometric equations

 

All Species (n = 285)

Lodgepole pine (n = 114)

Ponderosa pine (n = 108)

Douglas-fir (n = 63)

RMSE

Bias

RMSE

Bias

RMSE

Bias

RMSE

Bias

kg

%

kg

%

kg

%

kg

%

kg

%

kg

%

kg

%

kg

%

Local

27.9

46.3

9.1

15.1

30.7

71.3

16.0

37.1

16.6

23.1

3.8

5.2

36.6

51.7

5.8

8.2

Jenkins

40.6

67.4

9.3

15.4

16.1

37.5

5.2

12.0

17.3

23.9

− 3.3

− 4.5

80.5

113.7

38.2

54.0

FIA-CRM

37.3

62.0

− 16.1

− 26.8

23.0

53.5

− 7.9

− 18.3

45.4

62.9

− 27.1

− 37.6

42.5

60.0

− 12.3

− 17.4

  1. Negative bias values indicate that the allometric equations are under-predicting biomass compared to the Legacy Database biomass