From: Controlling CO2 emissions for each area in a region: the case of Japan
Hokkaido | Tohoku | Kanto | Chubu | Kansai | Chugoku | Shikoku | Kyushu | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\(A_{j,1}\) | 5.598 | 6.619 | 9.855 | 8.172 | 8.061 | 7.220 | 6.357 | 6.295 |
\(L_{j,1}\) | 5.382 | 9.006 | 42.656 | 21.409 | 22.500 | 7.441 | 3.865 | 14.432 |
\(Q_{j,1}\) | 0.159 | 0.289 | 1.692 | 0.799 | 0.778 | 0.255 | 0.121 | 0.416 |
\(K_{j,1}\) | 1.362 | 1.729 | 4.427 | 3.387 | 2.889 | 1.343 | 0.783 | 2.309 |
\(E_{j,1}\) | 0.078 | 0.107 | 0.506 | 0.287 | 0.281 | 0.171 | 0.053 | 0.176 |
\(\sigma _{j,1}\) | 0.485 | 0.358 | 0.290 | 0.348 | 0.350 | 0.651 | 0.426 | 0.410 |
\(g_{\sigma }(1)\) | − 0.0152 | − 0.0152 | − 0.0152 | − 0.0152 | − 0.0152 | − 0.0152 | − 0.0152 | − 0.0152 |
\(\zeta _{1,j}\) | 0.076 | 0.076 | 0.076 | 0.076 | 0.076 | 0.076 | 0.076 | 0.076 |
\(\zeta _{2,j}\) | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 |
\(\zeta _{3,j}\) | 4.005 | 6.203 | 39.252 | 17.691 | 18.384 | 6.063 | 2.822 | 11.996 |
\(\zeta _{4,j}\) | 0.153 | 0.160 | 0.082 | 0.149 | 0.145 | 0.150 | 0.170 | 0.146 |