Skip to main content

Table 4 Avoided fossil fuels for the harvest residues for bioenergy scenario, where bioenergy facilities were selected to maximize avoided emissions

From: Climate change mitigation in Canada’s forest sector: a spatially explicit case study for two regions

Region Heat produced (GWh) Electricity produced (GWh) Electricity exported (GWh) H: NG (GWh) H: electricity (GWh) H: fuel oil (GWh) H: propane (GWh) H: wood (GWh) H: coke and petcoke (GWh)
Dog River, Ontario 11.3 4.5 26.3 6.4 0.6 0.7 0 0 3.6
Cranbrook FMU, BC 611.8 164.9 0 234.8 0 245.6 0 0 131.4
Thunder Bay, Ontario 116.2 34.3 0 0 0 116.2 0 0 0
Cranbrook 274.0 47.6 0 260.0 0 4.9 8.6 0.4 0
Elkford 40.8 0.7 0 35.7 0 1.8 3.2 0 0
Fernie 99.0 46.6 27.7 93.8 0 1.4 2.5 1.3 0
Kimberley 101.8 1.8 0 90.9 0 4.0 7.0 0 0
Sparwood 13.0 0.3 0 8.0 0 1.8 3.2 0 0
\