Class | Genera Tree species | CHM (%) | Biomass estimates Allometric equation | Growth function (DBH); residual error |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acer campestre, Acer platanoides, Acer sp. | 12.9 | Equation 2, Acer saccharum [99] | \(202.9173*(1 - e^{{\left( {age\,*\, -\,0.0019} \right)}} )^{0.7992}\); 5.48 |
2 | Aesculus hypocastanum | 13.4 | Table 1, Aesculus indica [100] | \(175.5828*(1 - e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0042} \right)}} )^{0.8958}\); 6.57 |
3 | Fagus sylvatica | 10.4 | Appendix A, Equation 89, Fagus sylvatica [101] | \(202.9173*(1 - e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0019} \right)}} )^{0.7992}\); 6.15 |
4 | Pinus sylvestris | 11.3 | Table 3, Pinus sylvestris [102] | \(135.4549*e^{{\left( { - \,3.1143 \,*\, e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0152} \right)}} } \right)}}\); 4.74 |
5 | Platanus hispanica | 1.9 | Volume of Platanus acerifolia, gravity of Platanus [103, 104] | \(170.5888*(1 - e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0047} \right)}} )^{0.913}\); 4.95 |
6 | Populus nigra, Populus alba | 1.8 | Populus tremula [101] | \(93.5402*(1 - e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0152} \right)}} )^{1.1518}\); 10.77 |
7 | Quercus robur, Quercus rubra, Quercus sp. | 8.6 | Table 3, Quercus sp. [102] | \(70.2797*e^{{\left( { -\, 2.8528 \,*\, e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0289} \right)}} } \right)}}\); 4.03 |
8 | Tilia cordata, Tilia × vulgaris, Tilia platyphyllos | 13.2 | \(56.4678*(1 - e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0182} \right)}} )^{1.053}\); 5.71 | |
9 | Betula pendula | / | Appendix A, Equation 31, Betula pendula [101] | \(199.1001*(1 - e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0029} \right)}} )^{0.8865}\); 4.48 |
10 | Robinia pseudoacacia | / | Table 2, Equation 6, Robinia pseudoacacia [105] | \(116.6451*e^{{\left( { - \,3.1542\, *\, e^{{\left( {age \,*\, -\, 0.0198} \right)}} } \right)}}\); 5.40 |
Mix | Mix of dominant species above | 26.5 | Average of equations listed above | Average of equations listed above |