From: Impact of data model and point density on aboveground forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR
Sierra Nevada Mountains, California | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Point density (points m−2) | Plot size (ha) | AUCW | CV | FC | Max-H | MeanH | P25H | P50H | P75H | P90H | StdH | ||||||||||
E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | E-B | CHM | ||
Original | 0.09–0.25 | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ |
0.09–0.50 | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | |
0.09–1.00 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | |
10 points | 0.09–0.25 | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ |
0.09–0.50 | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | |
0.09–1.00 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | |
5 points | 0.09–0.25 | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ |
0.09–0.50 | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | |
0.09–1.00 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | |
1 points | 0.09–0.25 | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | – |
0.09–0.50 | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | ✓ | – | |
0.09–1.00 | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | – | ✓ | – | – | ✓ | – | ✓ | ✓ |