Skip to main content

Advertisement

Fig. 3 | Carbon Balance and Management

Fig. 3

From: Modelling forest carbon stock changes as affected by harvest and natural disturbances. I. Comparison with countries’ estimates for forest management

Fig. 3

The upper panel reports the harvest rate (m3 103) applied to Lithuania by our study; the lower panel reports the net CO2 emissions estimated by CBM (Mt CO2 year−1), further distinguished between living biomass, DOM (dead wood + litter) and soil pools and a comparison with the net CO2 emissions reported by the country for the land use category FL–FL (Lithuania, [18]), assumed as a proxy of the FM area, for those counties where FM had not been elected during the first KP commitment period)

Back to article page