Skip to main content

Table 3 Carbon benefits (Gg, 1 Gg=10 9 g) corresponding to area changes in Table 1

From: Carbon benefits from protected areas in the conterminous United States

 

C Benefits1

Unprotected scenario (Gg)2

 

From

Less C

Addi

State3

Protection (Gg)

Emitted

C Fixed

Alabama+

143

5,197

152

Arizona*

1,937

193

4

Arkansas+

2,606

3,343

116

California*

2,636

2,446

54

Colorado*

7,169

2,595

29

Connecticut

62

317

7

Delaware#

NA

113

3

Florida+

70

2,097

66

Georgia+

611

6,984

194

Idaho*

1,470

1,104

25

Illinois

516

620

7

Indiana

193

191

2

Iowa

0

248

4

Kansas$

NA

NA

NA

Kentucky+

251

2,546

69

Louisiana+

756

2,669

69

Maine

288

2,505

67

Maryland

97

485

10

Massachusetts

211

700

9

Michigan$

NA

NA

NA

Minnesota$

NA

NA

NA

Mississippi+

72

2,878

80

Missouri

748

2,239

33

Montana*

5,284

1,242

33

Nebraska#

NA

60

2

Nevada*

5,179

214

5

New Hampshire

295

342

5

New Jersey

361

194

5

New Mexico*

386

153

3

New York

1,771

1,954

36

North Carolina+

1,017

4,580

130

North Dakota$

NA

NA

NA

Ohio

120

1,037

29

Oklahoma+

369

1,461

47

Oregon*

8,120

7,911

513

Pennsylvania

227

1,324

33

Rhode Island

20

92

2

South Carolina+

231

3,465

92

South Dakota#

NA

60

1

Tennessee+

950

3,634

95

Texas+

570

5,944

168

Utah*

1,300

424

8

Vermont

84

219

3

Virginia+

1,477

2,899

78

Washington*

11,148

4345

243

West Virginia

166

960

23

Wisconsin

258

650

16

Wyoming*

7430

746

10

US48

66,599

83,380

2,580

  1. 1 State-level carbon benefits were estimated for forests in the protected areas compared to what could be emitted if there were no protection based on forest area lost rates in the corresponding state’s forests outside of protected areas. All carbon units are in gigagrams (Gg).
  2. 2 The predicted reduction in emissions of carbon (C), and additional C fixed if current net forest area loss rates were reduced by 20% in the 48 states’ unprotected forests.
  3. 3 See Table 1 for net deforestation rates in protected and unprotected forests in each state.
  4. + 13 Southern states (see Figure 2).
  5. * 11 Western states. The remaining states were in the Northern region.
  6. # States where forest area loss rates in the protected forests were larger than those in the unprotected forests. Therefore, calculation of presumed additional area loss in the protected forests using forest area loss rates in the corresponding unprotected forests (i.e., within the same state) were not applicable (NA).
  7. $ States gained forest areas during the period, thus, reduction in forest area loss is not applicable (NA).