Table 3 Comparison of the biomass maps with the NBS field data
From: Mapping biomass with remote sensing: a comparison of methods for the case study of Uganda
|  | All plots | Plots ≥ 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Map | N | Bias (Mg/ha) | RMSE (Mg/ha) | N | Bias (Mg/ha) | RMSE (Mg/ha) |
Avitabile | 850 | -2.9 | 17.7 | 173 | -1.7 | 13.6 |
Baccini | 888 | -4.8 | 24.7 | 184 | -7.5 | 23.5 |
Drigo | 985 | 39.3 | 57.2 | 664 | 38.8 | 54.0 |
Gibbs&Brown | 92 | 9.2 | 30.4 | 31 | 6.1 | 28.0 |
Henry | 878 | 51.1 | 62.2 | 183 | 57.1 | 69.9 |
NBS | 1129 | 1.1 | 24.1 | 693 | 0.9 | 19.5 |
Reusch&Gibbs | 778 | 35.5 | 66.7 | 160 | 31.5 | 65.1 |