Table 3 Mean tree-level differences in standing dead biomass (oven-dry kg) between estimation methods (1 = CRM vs. CRM+DRF and 2 = CRM vs. CRM + DRF+SLA) by tree component and decay class for quaking aspen in the Lake States (2005-2009) and Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest (2001-2009).

Quaking aspen

Douglas-fir

Comparison

1

2

3

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

1

0.8

6.7

11.8

8.7

8.4

9.7

16.7

37.7

4.0

33.8

2

1.2

17.2

23.2

21.4

21.8

10.6

59.9

82.2

9.7

59.6

1

2.6

21.5

39.2

30.0

29.4

60.1

104.7

237.9

13.6

215.7

2

3.8

25.2

44.0

36.5

37.3

65.8

130.0

268.2

16.5

239.6

1

0.1

1.1

2.0

1.5

1.5

2.2

3.6

7.6

0.7

6.4

2

0.2

1.3

2.3

1.8

1.8

2.4

4.5

8.6

0.8

7.1

1

0.7

5.7

10.3

7.8

7.6

16.2

28.0

63.4

3.5

57.1

2

1.0

7.5

13.7

13.2

14.7

17.7

41.4

88.1

6.0

82.1