Element | Examples of variation in implementation |
---|---|
Definition of forests, deforestation and degradation | National definitions Technically detailed versus general (e.g. three classes: forest, degraded forest, non-forest as proposed by Joint Research Centre) Marrakech accords (UNFCCC 2002): 0.05–1 ha minimum area, 10–30% tree canopy cover and a potential of 2–5 m tree height; used by Annex I country Kyoto reporting and CDM projects Others see Mollicone et al. [16] (intact forest, non-intact forest, non-forest) Deforestation versus deforestation and degradation |
Scale | National versus projects |
Minimum Mapping Unit | National, sectoral |
Target area | Sub-national |
Projects | |
Definition of MMU | |
Reference level, baseline | National historical averages with a correction for countries which have already significantly reduced deforestation; compared to reference (e.g. 1990 or 2000) |
Data for baseline | |
Baseline development | |
Global average deforestation rate, countries with less than half the global average will be credited for not increasing deforestation, geographical | |
Sophisticated prognostic model of land competition | |
Carbon model | Simple, national average carbon stock versus sophisticated assessment |
Inventory versus IPCC default values | |
Simple, national average carbon stock for both | |
intact and | |
non-intact (degraded) forest | |
Detailed carbon maps based on RS | |
Financing mechanism and trading | Instruments: |
Market-based | |
Tax | |
Incentives | |
Units created for trade: Certified emission reductions (CERs) in CDM projects: | |
Short-term credits (tCERs) | |
Long-term credits (lCERs) | |
Voluntary carbon market: | |
Not entire forest area accounted for | |
Only specified amount banked as buffer. |